Did Social Media Sink the Titanic?
April 17, 2012Did social media sink the Titanic?
I read the following on the Computerworld website:
The crowning technical glory on the Titanic was the advanced wireless communications setup for Morse Code, which was considered the most powerful setup in use at the time.
The Titanic's wireless system was capable of transmitting messages for 500 miles during the day and 2,000 miles at night.
Passengers were so excited about their cross-sea excursion and the opportunity to send wireless messages to friends and family at home that they overwhelmed the wireless operators and the machine with personal messages. The wireless operators, inundated with messages to send, became overworked and tired.
That was going to be a critical mistake.
Around 11:30 p.m. on April 14, an operator on the SS Californian, a British steamship sailing not far from the Titanic, messaged the Titanic, warning the captain that there was ice ahead. Stressed and fatigued, Jack Phillips, the Titanic's on-duty wireless operator, angrily shot back the message, "Shut up, Shut up, I'm working Cape Race."
Phillips meant that he was busy relaying messages to a wireless station in Cape Race, Newfoundland, about 800 miles away.
The Californian didn't respond to the Titanic's distress signals because its wireless operator had gone to bed after being rebuffed about his iceberg warning.
Was this the first recorded case of a social media related denial of service attack?
Would an acceptable use policy have helped avoid the wireless operator becoming stressed out sending personal messages? What about a fair use policy?
It seems whenever a shiny new technology offers the ability to communicate with our social networks we humans jump on the opportunity.
How many large organisations get distracted by the social networking 'threat', but fail to keep watch on the icebergs, the things they can't control?
Posted by Richard Beach.
